The 19th century witnessed a profound transformation to the British economy and society, that was catalysed by the Industrial Revolution. Central to this transformation was the proliferation of factories, particularly in industries like textiles, which depended heavily on child labour. The working conditions for children in these factories were often dire, sparking a series of legislative efforts to regulate child labour. This article delves into the key Factory Acts addressing children’s employment, the lived experiences of child workers, and the slow march towards improved labour standards.
The Factory Acts and Their Impact on Child Labour
The Factory Acts were a series of laws aimed at addressing the harsh realities of child labour. Each act would progressively restrict the working hours and imposed standards for the treatment of children:
Health and Morals of Apprentices Act (1802)
This is the first significant legislation targeting child labour, that would limit working hours for apprentice children in textile mills to 12 hours a day, excluding breaks. Night work was prohibited. However, this law applied only to apprentice children, leaving “free” children unprotected. Lets pause for a moment and just take a look at the differences between apprentice children and free children.
The difference between apprentice children and free children in the context of early factory work and child labour legislation lies in their status, obligations, and the conditions under which they were employed:
Apprentice Children
- Definition: These children were typically orphaned or abandoned and were placed into work by local authorities or charitable organisations. They were bound by formal apprenticeship agreements, often involving a legal contract between the child (or their guardians) and their employer.
- Living Arrangements: Apprentice children often lived at the factory site or in accommodation provided by their employer, such as dormitories. This was especially common in rural areas where mills were far from towns.
- Employment Conditions: Employers had significant control over apprentice children, who were obligated to work as part of their apprenticeship. They were often subject to harsh conditions, long hours, and exploitation.
- Legal Protections: Early legislation, such as the Health and Morals of Apprentices Act 1802, aimed to improve conditions for apprentice children but did not extend to free children. It limited their working hours to 12 hours a day, prohibited night work, and required some basic provisions for health and education.
Free Children
- Definition: These were children who lived with their families and were not bound by an apprenticeship agreement. They worked in factories voluntarily, though economic necessity often leaving families with little choice.
- Living Arrangements: Free children lived at home with their families and commuted to work.
- Employment Conditions: Employers had less direct control over free children compared to apprentices. However, their working conditions were often equally harsh, with long hours, low pay, and poor working environments.
- Legal Protections: Early laws like the Health and Morals of Apprentices Act 1802 did not apply to free children. It wasn’t until later laws, such as the Factories Act 1833, that free children were granted some protections, including limits on working hours and mandatory schooling requirements.
Key Distinctions
| Aspect | Apprentice Children | Free Children |
|---|---|---|
| Source of Labour | Orphans or children placed by authorities | Children living with their families |
| Legal Binding | Bound by an apprenticeship contract | No legal binding; hired like adults |
| Living Arrangements | Often housed by employers | Lived at home with families |
| Applicability of 1802 Act | Covered under the act’s provisions | Not covered by the act |
| Employer’s Control | Significant control, akin to ownership | Limited to work-related activities |
Historical Context
- Apprenticeship System: The apprenticeship system arose out of necessity when mills in rural areas faced labour shortages. Employers often “imported” orphaned or abandoned children from urban areas to fill labour gaps.
- Shift in Focus: Over time, with the rise of urban factories powered by steam engines, the reliance on free children grew, leading to broader labour reforms to include protections for all working children.
This distinction between apprentice and free children reflects the evolving understanding of child labour during the Industrial Revolution and the gradual implementation of protective legislation.
Cotton Mills and Factories Act (1819)
The Cotton Mills and Factories Act (1819) was aimed specifically at the cotton industry, and this act prohibited the employment of children under nine and restricted those aged 9 to 16 to work no more than 12 hours per day. While ground-breaking, enforcement was weak.
Mills and Factories Act (1833)
The Mills and Factories Act (1833) was known as “Althorp’s Act,” this legislation represented a major step forward. It prohibited children under nine from working in textile factories (except silk mills) and restricted children aged 9 to 13 to work an 8-hour day, with breaks of 1-hour. It also mandated schooling for two hours daily and introduced routine factory inspections.
Labour in Factories Act (1844)
The Labour in Factories Act (1844) would reduce children’s working hours to 6.5 hours a day and mandated a half-day of schooling. It introduced safety measures, required machinery to be fenced off and prohibiting children and women from cleaning moving machines. Accidental deaths were to be investigated.
Factories Act (1847)
The Factories Act (1847) this act was was also called the “Ten Hours Act,” this law limited women and young people to working 10 hours on a weekday and 8 hours on a Saturday. This act indirectly reduced adult men’s working hours, as their productivity depended on the auxiliary roles of women and children.
The Realities of Child Workers’ Lives
Roles and Responsibilities
Children employed in textile factories often worked as:
- Scavengers: Crawling under machinery to collect fallen cotton, a task fraught with danger.
- Piecers: Mending broken threads on spinning machines, requiring precision and speed.
In larger towns like Manchester, about five-twelfths of the cotton factory workforce in 1819 were under 16. These children worked long hours in environments laden with cotton dust and poor ventilation, contributing to respiratory illnesses and physical deformities.
Living Conditions
The children’s working day often began before dawn and ended well after sunset. Their meals were rushed and frequently inadequate. Families were reliant on children’s earnings and sometimes faced a heart-breaking dilemma between survival and their children’s health.
Many children were orphans, and were referred to as “apprentices,” who were sent to work in remote mills. They often lived in overcrowded dormitories provided by mill owners, receiving meagre food and harsh treatment.
Voices of the Time
The plight of child workers drew the attention of reformers and authors. Thackrah (1832) vividly described the grim realities:
“Children roused from their beds at an early hour, hurried to the mills, and kept there with the interval of only 40 minutes, till a late hour at night; kept, moreover, in an atmosphere impure … loaded with noxious dust.”
The Manchester Board of Health in 1805 similarly lamented:
“The untimely and protracted labour of the children … tends to diminish future expectations, as to the general sum of life and industry, by impairing the strength and destroying the vital stamina of the rising generation.”
Resistance and Progress
The reliance on child labour stemmed not only from economic necessity but also from systemic poverty. Many parents had no choice but to send their children to work to supplement meagre family income. Poor Law provisions often forced families to prove their children were employed before receiving aid, perpetuating the cycle of exploitation.
Not all mill owners were indifferent to their workers’ suffering. Some voluntarily improved conditions, reduced hours, provided meals, and even offered schooling. A report from 1819 noted that in the Bolton region, while 12 mills treated children poorly, 17 mills maintained better conditions, with children described as “happy” and “healthy.”
Legacy and Lessons
By the mid-19th century, the efforts of reformers like Lord Shaftesbury and the enforcement of Factory Acts began to yield visible improvements. The introduction of schooling and reduced working hours helped shift perceptions of childhood, emphasising education and development over labour.
While the Factory Acts addressed many abuses, the legacy of child labour in Britain’s industrial past remains a stark reminder of the cost of rapid industrialisation. The stories of these young workers underscore the importance of continued vigilance in labour rights, particularly in modern industries where child exploitation still exists globally.
The gradual progress made through legislation and societal awareness serves as a testament to the power of advocacy and reform, ensuring that future generations are spared the hardships endured by children in the mills of 19th-century Britain.
#19thCentury #IndustrialRevolution #ChildLabour #FactoryActs
Rachel Bakewell 